Calculation instructions must agree with the tool's actual behavior.
How Avenyora works
The standards behind an Avenyora guide
A useful guide should answer the question its title promises, identify the basis of important claims and avoid turning symbolism into certainty. These standards describe the content Avenyora aims to publish and the limits readers should expect. A source link or a polished layout is not, by itself, evidence that a page is accurate.
Clear method Reflection, not prediction
Quick guide
What to know first
Historical sources support claims about a tradition, not proof of supernatural effects.
Original reflection exercises are suggestions rather than validated assessments.
An unavailable feature must not be advertised as if it can complete the promised task.
Readers should be able to report a specific error without sending unnecessary personal data.
Identify the kind of claim being made
A guide can contain several kinds of material: a description of software behavior, a historical convention, an original exercise and a factual claim about the world. Each needs a different basis. A calculation example should be reproducible. A historical statement should be traceable to a relevant source. An exercise should be described as an exercise rather than presented as a diagnostic instrument.
For example, calling a zodiac sign cardinal is a statement about a particular astrological classification. Saying that a person will become a leader because of that classification is a different claim and is not established by the classification itself. The distinction belongs in the explanation, not only in a small disclaimer at the bottom of the page.
Use sources for the statement they actually support
A scientific institution's explanation of the ecliptic can support a description of astronomical coordinates. It cannot be borrowed as an endorsement of an astrological personality claim. NASA's discussion of the ecliptic is useful for understanding the apparent path of the Sun, not for proving a relationship prediction.
Likewise, a museum catalogue can document a tarot object's history without verifying divination. The Metropolitan Museum of Art's tarot history is a source for historical context. When a guide moves from history into a modern reflective activity, it should make that move visible. A reader should not have to guess whether an exercise came from the cited source or was created for the page.
Prefer a complete task to a collection of keywords
A useful Life Path guide should let a reader check a calculation convention, understand the particular theme and consider a relevant counterexample. Repeating broad encouragement with a different number does not provide that value. A method page should describe the method rather than expose directions addressed to a writer.
Examples should make the limitations easier to see. A fictional scenario must not masquerade as a testimonial. A claim of expert review needs an actual identified basis; a general team label cannot substitute for a specialist credential. The presence of automated content checks means only that specified patterns were checked, not that a human specialist has reviewed every conclusion.
Corrections should preserve the reader's context
When you notice an error, send the page address, the sentence or result at issue and the reason it seems wrong through the site's contact route. For a calculation, a minimal reproducible example is useful; an identity document or unrelated private conversation is not. If the example concerns another person, use a fictional equivalent wherever possible.
A correction may change an explanation, an example or an availability statement. It should not hide the difference between an old claim and a better-supported one. Until a material uncertainty is resolved, readers should treat that part of the guide cautiously. These standards are an editorial commitment, not a guarantee of perfect accuracy or a statement that every historical page has already completed a new review.
Common questions
Frequently asked questions
Does a reference to NASA mean NASA endorses astrology?
No. An astronomical source supports only the relevant astronomical facts. It does not establish that symbolic descriptions predict personality, compatibility or future events.
Are reflection exercises scientific personality tests?
No. They are optional prompts intended to help you examine experience. A useful response to an exercise is not a validated score or a diagnosis.
How can I report an inaccurate guide?
Provide the page address, the disputed statement and a brief explanation or relevant source. Avoid sending passwords, private documents or personal information unrelated to the error.